VRIL LIZARDS
  ~ ANCIENT TRUTH ~

Click here to edit subtitle

DECEPTION

AGENT #1  DAVID ICKE

AGENT #2  JESSE VENTURA 

AGENT #3 ALEX JONES

AGENT #4  DAVID WILCOCK

AGENT #5   MICHAEL MOORE

AGENT #6 STEVEN J. CHRISTOPHER

AGENT #7 MARK DICE

AGENT #8 GEORGE CARLIN

AGENT (TEAM) #9 LENNY BLOOM JANE STEELE (pic not available)

AGENT #10 DIETER BRAUN

AGENT #11 BENJAMIN FULFORD

AGENT #12 JULIAN ASSANGE

AGENT #13 DANA HOROCHOWSKI

AGENT #14 GALACTIC FEDERATION OF LIGHT 

AGENT #15 IDYLWILD GROUP

NO PIC AVAILABLE

LINK TO SITE

FORMER WHITE HAT

More to come. Research & question all!

MISINFORMATION HAS BEEN IN WIDE CIRCULATION AMONG THE GENERLAL POPULATION FOR DECADES NOW. IT HAS BEEN SYSTEMICALLY ORCHESTRATED BY THE POWERS THAT BE TO KEEP THE PUBLIC CONFUSED. THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE WHO SEEM TO BE SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT, SECRET SOCIETIES, CORRUPTION, ETC., HOWEVER; MANY IF NOT MOST OF THEM ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED. THEY ARE PART OF THE ATTEMPT TO KEPT THE ANCIENT TRUTH BURIED. A LOT OF POPULAR 'CONSPIRACY THEORISTS' ARE TOTALLY IN THE LOOP AND KNOW ALL ABOUT VRIL LIZARDS AND COME UP WITH EXTRAVAGENT DIVERSIONS TO KEEP YOU IN THE DARK YET FEELING LIKE YOU'VE LEARNED A GREAT TRUTH. PLEASE USE YOUR COMMON SENSE WHEN ABSORBING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE LIKES OF SOME OF THE PEOPLE/GROUPS LISTED HEREIN.

MAIN STREAM MEDIA

VIDEO (above) ~ MASS MEDIA-HOW THEY CONTROL YOU

            Active Provocateur

There can be active and passive provocation agents. A double agent may serve as a means through which a provocation can be mounted against a person, an organization, an intelligence or security service, or any affiliated group to induce action to its own disadvantage. The provocation might be aimed at identifying members of the other service, at diverting it to less important objectives, at tying up or wasting its assets and facilities, at sowing dissension within its ranks, at inserting false data into its files to mislead it, at building up in it a tainted file for a specific purpose, at forcing it to surface an activity it wanted to keep hidden, or at bringing public discredit on it, making it look like an organization of idiots. The Soviets and some of the Satellite services, the Poles in particular, are extremely adept in the art of conspiratorial provocation. All kinds of mechanisms have been used to mount provocation operations; the double agent is only one of them.


An active one is sent by Service A to Service B to tell B that he works for A but wants to switch sides. Or he may be a talk-in rather than a walk-in. In any event, the significant information that he is withholding, in compliance with A's orders, is the fact that his offer is being made at A's instigation. He is also very likely to conceal one channel of communication with A-for example, a second secret writing system. Such "side-commo" enables A to keep in full touch while sending through the divulged communications channel only messages meant for adversary eyes. The provocateur may also conceal his true sponsor, claiming for example (and truthfully) to represent an A1 service (allied with A) whereas his actual control is the A-a fact which the Soviets conceal from the Satellite as carefully as from us.



        Passive Provocateur

Passive provocations are variants involving false-flag recruiting.

In Country C, Service A surveys the intelligence terrain through the eyes of Service B (a species of mirror-reading) and selects those citizens whose access to sources and other qualifications make them most attractive to B. Service A officers, posing as service B officers, recruit the citizens of country C. At some point, service A then exposes these individuals, and complains to country C that country B is subverting its citizens.


The stake-out has a far better chance of success in areas like Africa, where intelligence exploitation of local resources is far less intensive than in Europe, where persons with valuable access are likely to have been approached repeatedly by recruiting services during the postwar years

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterintelligence#Active_provocateur

Project MKUltra was the code name of a U.S. government covert research operation experimenting in the behavioral engineering of humans (mind control) through the CIA's Scientific Intelligence Division. The program began in the early 1950s, was officially sanctioned in 1953, was reduced in scope in 1964, further curtailed in 1967 and "officially halted" in 1973. The program engaged in many illegal activities; in particular it used unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens as its test subjects, which led to controversy regarding its legitimacy. MKUltra involved the use of many methodologies to manipulate people's individual mental states and alter brain functions, including the surreptitious administration of drugs (especiallyLSD) and other chemicals, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, as well as various forms of torture.


The scope of Project MKUltra was broad, with research undertaken at 80 institutions, including 44 colleges and universities, as well as hospitals, prisons and pharmaceutical companies. The CIA operated through these institutions using front organizations, although sometimes top officials at these institutions were aware of the CIA's involvement. MKUltra was allocated 6 percent of total CIA funds.


In 1977, a Freedom of Information Act request uncovered a cache of 20,000 documents relating to project MKUltra, which led to Senate hearings later that same year. In July 2001 some surviving information regarding MKUltra was officially declassified. 

SOURCE ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

INFORMATION LINKS 

Indoctrination inculcating ideas, attitudes, cognitive strategies or a professional methodology (see doctrine).[1] It is often distinguished from education by the fact that the indoctrinated person is expected not to question or critically examine the doctrine they have learned.[2] As such the term may be used pejoratively, often in the context of education, political opinions, theology or religious dogma. The term is closely linked to socialization; in common discourse, indoctrination is often associated with negative connotations, while socialization refers to cultural or educational learning.


Religious Indoctrination

Religious indoctrination, the original sense of indoctrination, refers to a process of imparting doctrine in an authoritative way, as in catechism. Most religious groups among the revealed religionsinstruct new members in the principles of the religion; this is now not usually referred to as indoctrination by the religions themselves, in part because of the negative connotations the word has acquired. Mystery religions require a period of indoctrination before granting access to esoteric knowledge. (cf. Information security)

As a pejorative term, indoctrination implies forcibly or coercively causing people to act and think on the basis of a certain ideology.[3] Some secular critics[who?] maintain that all religions indoctrinate their adherents, as children, and the accusation is made in the case of religious extremism. Sects such as Scientology use personality tests and peer pressures to indoctrinate new members.[4] Some religions have commitment ceremonies for children 13 years and younger, such as Bar Mitzvah, Confirmation, and Shichi-Go-San. In Buddhism, temple boys are encouraged to follow the faith while still very young.[citation needed] Critics of religion, such as Richard Dawkins, maintain that the children of religious parents are often unfairly indoctrinated.[5] The process of subjecting children to complex initiation rituals before they are able to critically assess the event is seen by Dawkins and other critics of religion as cruel. Source ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indoctrination